All lessons
Lesson 04

Empathy & customer evidenceModule 02 · Customers, innovation & market focus

IGNITE EXTENDED / LESSON 04

Empathy & customer evidence

How can you uncover a need without pitching your solution?

An empathy log and two evidence-backed needs.

S05 · S06 · S081 / 35
1
04 / OpeningEmpathy & customer evidence

The decision and the learning goals

  • Write questions about actual behavior
  • Separate an observation from your interpretation
  • Identify a need that deserves further investigation
90-minute workshopOpening 5 minConcepts and original examples 35 minPractice 25 minDebrief 15 minReview 10 min
S05 · S06 · S082 / 35
2
04 / Module caseEmpathy & customer evidence

Stanley's Quencher: the customer the company was not looking at

For decades Stanley sold vacuum bottles and thermoses to tradespeople and outdoor customers. Its 40-ounce Quencher tumbler got little attention, and by 2019 it was not a priority. In 2017 three women in Utah had started The Buy Guide, a shopping blog and Instagram account whose audience was 97.7% women, and they made the Quencher their main recommended product. When they heard it might be dropped, they told followers to buy whatever stock was left. Stanley had no affiliate program, so it asked them to place a wholesale order. The first 5,000 cups sold in about four days and the next 5,000 in about an hour. The founders then told Stanley executives that the cup was being marketed to the wrong people. In 2020 Terence Reilly, formerly of Crocs, became Stanley's president. He made the hydration category a priority, partnered with The Buy Guide on new colors and moved to limited-edition releases. Stanley's sales grew from $73 million in 2019 to $402 million in 2022, and CNBC reported a projection above $750 million for 2023.

Sources: CNBC (Dec 2023): How a 40-ounce cup turned Stanley into a $750 million a year business · Retail Dive: Stanley Quencher tumblers' viral success

Stanley's sales data said the Quencher was a weak product. What would an empathy-led team have watched for and asked about, and which of Stanley's assumptions about who its user is did that evidence overturn?

Module 02 case3 / 35
3
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

Observed behavior, interpretation and unmet need

An observation records what a person did or said in a specific situation. An interpretation proposes why it happened. A need describes something the person is trying to accomplish. Keeping these separate makes it possible to revise an explanation without losing the original evidence.

The empathy material emphasizes implicit needs because customers often describe a familiar solution rather than the underlying purpose. A request for a larger calendar may express a need to coordinate several people with confidence. The underlying need admits more possible solutions than the requested interface.

S05 · S06 · S084 / 35
4
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

The need ladder moves between purpose and behavior

Moving upward on the ladder asks why a requested feature matters. Moving downward asks how the person currently accomplishes the task and what a concrete episode looked like. Both movements are necessary. Purpose without behavior becomes vague, while behavior without purpose can lead to a narrow feature fix.

Use the person’s account to test each step. Avoid asking “why” in a way that pressures them to invent a rational explanation. Questions about the last occurrence, the surrounding circumstances and the consequence of failure often provide stronger evidence.

S05 · S06 · S085 / 35
5
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

A customer-evidence loop

Use the loop to turn a surprising customer episode into a testable explanation. The example follows a coordinator checking availability across several calendars.

01

Observe

Record what happened before interpreting it: the coordinator opened three calendars, messaged two colleagues and postponed confirmation. Keep the setting, sequence and tools in the evidence log.

02

Ask

Explore that recent episode: what triggered the check, which information was missing and what would happen if the meeting conflicted? Ask for behavior and consequences before requesting opinions about a proposed app.

03

Interpret

Propose a need that explains the behavior: confidence that required participants can attend. This is broader than a request for a larger calendar and allows several possible solutions.

04

Check

Seek another explanation and a contrasting episode. The obstacle could be outdated records, restricted permissions or a colleague who never updates availability. Each explanation suggests a different response.

The next distinction, observation versus interpretation, protects the loop: changing your explanation must not erase the original event.

S05 · S06 · S086 / 35
6
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

Observation and interpretation

Preserve what happened separately from your explanation. That separation lets another researcher propose a different explanation without losing the underlying evidence.

Observation

“The customer copied the same address into three forms.”

Interpretation

“The customer needs a single shared record.” The interpretation may be useful, but it is not the observation itself.

Worked application

Illustrative application: a coordinator opens three calendars. “She distrusts the shared calendar” is one explanation. Permission restrictions or missing external participants are alternatives. Ask about the recent episode and observe another attempt before turning distrust into the problem the product must solve.

A need statement is an informed interpretation. Keep the observation that supports it and the alternatives still unresolved.

S05 · S06 · S087 / 35
7
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

Questions about behavior

AvoidAsk instead
Would you use an automated tool?Tell me about the last time you completed this task.
Do you find the process frustrating?Where did you stop, repeat work or ask for help?
Would a faster screen be better?What happened while you were waiting?
How much would you pay?How do you solve this now, and what does that cost?
S05 · S06 · S088 / 35
8
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

Observe the surrounding situation

  • Look at triggers, tools, workarounds and handoffs.
  • Ask what the person was trying to accomplish.
  • Notice constraints: time, skill, permission, money and environment.
  • Explore extreme users when they reveal needs that are easy to miss in an average case.
S05 · S06 · S089 / 35
9
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

The five design-thinking stages, with empathy first

Five linked hexagons: Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test. Each has a one-line description. Empathize means learning about the person through observation, interviews, immersion and engagement. Testing is described as "another round of empathy work."

Empathy comes before Define, so the problem statement comes from evidence instead of being assumed. Testing feeds back into empathy, which makes the model a loop. Relay's interviews this week belong to the first stage, so they should not include a demo.

Source insight · S05 · PDF page 710 / 35
10
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

The desire path: what customers actually need versus what we think they need

A photo of a paved loop around a round flower bed. A worn dirt path runs straight across the bed. The paved loop is labeled "what we think our customers need" and the dirt path "what our customers actually need."

The trail is evidence of behavior. No one was asked about it, and it records what people do when the designed route doesn't fit their goal. Look for Relay's equivalent: the sticky note, the personal cell phone or the side spreadsheet that front-desk staff use in place of the official waitlist.

Source insight · S05 · PDF page 1011 / 35
11
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

Need-finding: explicit needs above the waterline, implicit needs below

An iceberg. The small tip above water is labeled EXPLICIT and the much larger mass below is labeled IMPLICIT.

People can state explicit needs on request, such as "a faster way to call the waitlist." Implicit needs, such as not looking incompetent to the therapist whose afternoon has a gap, usually have to be inferred from behavior and stories. The image claims they are larger. It doesn't measure them.

Source insight · S05 · PDF page 1112 / 35
12
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

The need ladder: from "she needs a book" to "a way to discover her purpose"

Concentric circles. The innermost ring holds the stated need, a book. The middle ring says "as a way to learn," and the outer ring says "as a way to discover her purpose." A tablet sits on the outer edge as an alternative way to meet the need.

Each step outward answers "why does that matter?" and admits more solutions. A tablet only appears as an option once you leave the innermost ring. Go up the ladder only as far as your evidence supports. Without episodes behind it, "discover her purpose" is speculation.

Source insight · S05 · PDF page 1313 / 35
13
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

Implicit needs enlarge the solution set

A large circle labeled "implicit needs lead to less obvious solutions" holds "a way to learn" and "a way to discover her purpose." A small circle at its edge labeled "explicit needs lead to obvious solutions" holds "ladder" and "book."

If you frame the request as the need, you get the ladder. If you frame the purpose as the need, you can get many responses. For Relay, "call the waitlist faster" leads to an auto-dialer. "Keep therapists' days full without front-desk heroics" also allows overbooking rules, standing short-notice lists and changes to the cancellation policy.

Source insight · S05 · PDF page 1414 / 35
14
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

Define each user: one product, several people with different needs

The question "who will benefit?" sits above an MRI-manufacturer example with three silhouettes: the procurement officer, the MRI mechanic and the patient.

The person who buys, the person who operates and the person who is affected often want different things. Relay has the same structure: a clinic owner who pays, a front-desk coordinator who works the waitlist and a patient who decides whether to take the slot. Interview each one separately.

Source insight · S05 · PDF page 1615 / 35
15
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

Observation: a kitchen knife and a child-resistant pill bottle

Two photos. A pharmacy prescription bottle with a child-resistant cap sits on a counter, and then a serrated kitchen knife is used on the bottle on a cutting board.

The workaround is evidence that no interview would produce, because few people would volunteer that they attack their medication with a knife. Record what you see: the tool, the step and the setting. Only then interpret it, for example as limited grip strength, impatience or a design that blocks the intended adult user.

Source insight · S05 · PDF page 1816 / 35
16
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

Extreme users reveal constraints

An extreme user experiences a relevant condition more intensely than an average user. They may have unusual frequency of use, physical constraints or a particularly demanding environment. Their workarounds can expose needs that are difficult to see in a convenient sample.

An extreme case helps generate and refine a hypothesis. It does not estimate how common the need is in the market. After identifying the mechanism, investigate where else it appears and which customers would pay for a solution. This connects empathy research to later segmentation work.

S05 · S06 · S0817 / 35
17
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

Interview evidence improves through specific episodes

A hypothetical question asks people to predict their future behavior. An episode question asks them to reconstruct something that happened. Prediction can be useful, but it is vulnerable to politeness, memory shortcuts and a desire to appear consistent.

The interview guidance favors short questions and listening for the person’s language. Follow a surprising detail instead of rushing through a fixed list. Record contradictions and workarounds. They often reveal the difference between a stated preference and the constraints governing actual behavior.

S05 · S06 · S0818 / 35
18
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

A need ladder

A need ladderA specific request“Give me a bigger calendar.”The task it supports“I need to compare several people’s availability.”The underlying need“I need confidence that everyone can attend.”

Move up by asking why; move down to recover concrete behavior.

S05 · S06 · S0819 / 35
19
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

A usable evidence log

RecordExample
EventA manager rescheduled a meeting after discovering a hidden conflict.
Observed behaviorShe checked three calendars and messaged two people.
InterpretationAvailability information was incomplete.
Follow-upWas the conflict caused by visibility, permissions or late changes?
S05 · S06 · S0820 / 35
20
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

A small sample is useful for learning, not prevalence

  • A vivid episode can reveal a mechanism or unmet need.
  • It does not establish how common the problem is.
  • Seek contradictory cases and distinguish who was observed from who was not.
S05 · S06 · S0821 / 35
21
04 / TheoryEmpathy & customer evidence

Write a need without smuggling in a solution

  • Name the person and situation.
  • Describe what they need to accomplish.
  • Keep the proposed interface or feature separate.
  • Retain the observation that led you to the interpretation.
S05 · S06 · S0822 / 35
22
04 / Deep diveEmpathy & customer evidence

Map every person around the problem

Buyer, operator and affected person often want different things. Write a separate need hypothesis for each.

Before interviewing, list each role that touches the problem and say what evidence would confirm or overturn its need. A role you leave out is a need you will discover only after launch.

Interview roles separately. In a joint interview, the senior person's account usually crowds out the operator's.

RoleRelation to an empty slotNeed hypothesisEvidence to seek
Clinic owner or office managerAbsorbs the lost revenue (about $110 per visit, illustrative)Predictable therapist utilization without adding staffHow gaps are tracked, if at all, and what has been tried before
Front-desk coordinatorDoes the work of filling the gapFill a slot quickly without abandoning patients at the deskShadowed episodes: time spent, tools used, outcome
Physical therapistLoses the hour or fills it with paperworkA schedule that doesn't depend on luckWhat they did with the last empty hour
Waitlisted patientDecides whether the slot is filledAn earlier appointment that fits work and travel constraintsLast time they were offered a short-notice slot and why they said yes or no

Illustrative Relay map. Each need is a hypothesis to test, not a finding.

S05 · S06 · S0823 / 35
23
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

OXO Good Grips: designing for the extreme user

An OXO Good Grips vegetable peeler with its thick, soft, ribbed handle next to the brand name.

The widely told origin story is that OXO's founder designed the handle for a user with arthritis. The resulting grip was more comfortable for ordinary cooks too. The lesson is that extreme users show you a mechanism, here grip force. Market size still needs separate evidence. Relay's extreme users could be the clinic with the highest cancellation rate, or the coordinator who already fills nearly every gap by hand.

Source insight · S05 · PDF page 3124 / 35
24
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

Interview technique checklist

A list of interview rules: keep questions to about ten words, avoid yes/no questions, ask about specific occasions instead of what usually happens, ask why several times, avoid leading questions, listen most of the time, seek stories and allow silence. Examples include asking what someone ate for lunch today and following the reasons behind three hours of exercise.

Each rule protects the same thing: an account of real behavior that your expectations haven't shaped. "Do you usually struggle to fill cancellations?" invites a general opinion. "What happened with the last same-day cancellation?" gets an episode you can check.

Source insight · S06 · PDF page 725 / 35
25
04 / Source insightEmpathy & customer evidence

Reflect and synthesize after each interview

Debrief prompts for interview pairs: what surprised you, which pain points and needs came up, what the person thought and felt, how the interviews changed your view of the product, and what one more question you would ask.

The last two prompts matter most. They make you record how the evidence challenged your assumptions and what is still unknown. Answer them the same day, before memory merges several interviews into one story.

Source insight · S06 · PDF page 826 / 35
26
04 / Deep diveEmpathy & customer evidence

Field research in regulated settings

Shadowing a clinic's front desk puts you next to protected health information. Plan the session so you never capture it.

Write down roles, times, counts and actions, for example "called patient 3 of 5," and leave out names, phone numbers and diagnoses. Photograph tools and workarounds only after checking that no screen or list showing patient data is in the frame.

Get the clinic's permission in advance, tell staff what you will and won't record, and keep notes in a shared folder that nobody outside the team can open. Whether HIPAA or state privacy law applies to a particular visit depends on current law and the facts, so get legal review before you start.

S05 · S06 · S0827 / 35
27
04 / ApplicationEmpathy & customer evidence

Fictional interview: an unreliable handoff

“Yesterday I sent the delivery instructions by email. The driver called because he could not find them. I texted a photo, but the office later used the old address. I do not need more messages; I need to know everyone has the right version.”

What is directly reported, and which needs are still hypotheses?

S05 · S06 · S0828 / 35
28
04 / Current practiceEmpathy & customer evidence

Current practice: AI in customer research

Synthetic users can't supply episodes

Nielsen Norman Group compared AI-generated "synthetic users" with real participants. The synthetic users claimed they had finished online courses that real learners admitted abandoning. They praised discussion forums that most real learners avoided, and they treated every need as important. NN/g recommends using them only for desk research or to pilot an interview guide, never in place of real users.

Use AI to prepare and organize, not to interpret for you

An LLM can turn a question list into a draft guide, flag leading questions, or tag transcripts by theme. You still have to keep each tagged passage tied to the original episode and check which contradictions a summary has smoothed over.

Recordings in clinical settings can carry protected health information

If an interview or shadowing session captures patient details, any cloud transcription or storage vendor handling that data may be a HIPAA business associate and need a business associate agreement (BAA). Under HHS guidance, cloud providers that store or process electronic PHI are business associates. The simplest safeguard is to design the session so no patient identifiers are recorded. Whether HIPAA applies depends on current law and the facts, so get legal review.

Sources: Nielsen Norman Group (2024): Synthetic Users: If, When, and How to Use AI-Generated Research · Nielsen Norman Group (2025): Synthetic Users: AI Participants (video) · HHS: Business Associates guidance

S05 · S06 · S0829 / 35
29
04 / PracticeEmpathy & customer evidence

Build an empathy log

Use the fictional interview on the preceding slide; treat it as the full available interview packet.

Your task

Record three reported events, two possible explanations, an underlying need and three follow-up questions. Do not propose an application yet.

S05 · S06 · S0830 / 35
30
04 / DebriefEmpathy & customer evidence

Worked answer and reasoning

  • The reported events concern scattered instructions, a driver’s call and use of an old address.
  • Possible explanations include inaccessible instructions and uncontrolled versions; neither is proven.
  • A defensible need is confidence that the people carrying out a delivery share the current instructions. Ask about the actual handoff and how updates propagate.
S05 · S06 · S0831 / 35
31
04 / Venture stepEmpathy & customer evidence

Venture step: Front-desk empathy plan and interview guide

Relay · venture step 04

Maya is sure about the problem because she lived it. As operations manager of a 6-location Austin PT group, she watched front-desk staff spend about an hour a day phoning patients to fill gaps. Daniel wants proof that this is not one group's habit. They are about to talk to clinics that might pilot Relay. A typical small clinic has 4 therapists, about 280 visits a week and about 42 empty slots from late cancellations and no-shows (illustrative). The risk is that every conversation turns into a Relay pitch.

Your task

Produce an empathy plan and an interview guide. The plan covers who to observe and interview, where and when, and which extreme users to include. The guide has 8–10 episode-based questions. Add a two-column evidence log with three sample entries that keep observation apart from interpretation.

Relay · illustrative venture32 / 35
32
04 / Venture stepEmpathy & customer evidence

Venture step: worked reasoning

  • Sample (illustrative): 8 front-desk coordinators across 5 clinics, none from Maya's former group. Include 2 independents, 2 sites of multi-location groups and 1 hospital outpatient department. Add 3 owners or office managers and 4 waitlisted patients as separate user groups with separate needs.
  • Extreme users: the clinic with the highest late-cancellation rate, and a coordinator who already fills most gaps by hand. The second shows which mechanism works today. Neither tells you how common the problem is.
  • Observe before asking: shadow the first two hours of a weekday, when same-day cancellations tend to come in. Log each gap: the time it opened, every action taken, the tools used and how it ended. Write down no patient names or appointment details. Record counts and roles only.
  • Guide questions: "Walk me through the last same-day cancellation." "Who did you contact first, and why that person?" "What happened when nobody answered?" "What did the therapist do with the empty hour?" "Where do you keep the list of people who want an earlier slot?" Leave Relay out until the final five minutes, or leave it out entirely.
  • Evidence-log example. Observation: "At 7:48 the coordinator called 4 patients from a paper list, left 3 voicemails, and the 9:00 slot stayed empty." Interpretation A: patients ignore clinic calls. Interpretation B: few people can come in on 70 minutes' notice. Each points to a different product, so the next interview has to tell them apart.
Relay · illustrative venture33 / 35
33
04 / DebriefEmpathy & customer evidence

Reasoning traps

The pitch in disguise

Once Relay is described, interviewees start judging the idea and stop reporting what they do. Polite approval then gets logged as evidence. Keep the product out of the conversation, or hold it back until the episode questions are finished.

The founder's memory counted as fieldwork

Maya's years at one Austin PT group are a source of hypotheses. They are not a sample. Write her beliefs down as assumptions, then interview clinics she has never worked with, including types she doubts will fit.

Interviewing only the person who pays

Owners talk about revenue, coordinators know the workflow and patients decide whether a slot gets filled. A frame built from owner interviews alone can miss the reason the product fails at the front desk.

S05 · S06 · S0834 / 35
34
04 / ReviewEmpathy & customer evidence

What you can now explain

A Relay empathy plan (who, where, when, extreme users), a front-desk interview guide of 8–10 episode questions and an evidence log template that keeps observations apart from interpretations.

  • Keep observations, interpretations and needs as separate records, so a new explanation can replace an old one without losing the evidence.
  • Questions about a recent, specific episode give more reliable evidence than predictions or opinions about a proposed product.
  • Extreme users and workarounds show you mechanisms. How common those mechanisms are has to be established separately and across several user roles.

Next lesson: Problem framing, prototyping & learning

S05 · S06 · S0835 / 35
35